Why are people against stem cell research

The intention of stem cell research is to produce treatments for human diseases.And this developing human life is terminated for the sake of these medical experiments.To give a current example, if the HIV pandemic continues unabated it will provide a very strong selective pressure in favour of those few people who lack the receptors—CD4 and CCR5—to which the virus attaches.

Stem cell laws and policy in the United States - Wikipedia

This may have been partly in response to an increased frequency of abortion but it is likely also to have been influenced by a desire to bring Christian doctrine into line with 19 th century embryology.However, they usually get cheaper as the scale on which they are used increases.In fact, creating a developing human being by any kind of scientific technique (i.e. not by natural conception) is itself gravely immoral.Again, such attempts only pile one grave immoral act upon another.

There is, however, a further argument against this particular threat.If these promises hold true, stem cell therapy might result in a reduction in the overall cost of healthcare as a number of currently incurable diseases are cured.Photo credit: Getty Laboratory research on adult stem cells is generally uncontroversial.Related FAQs Why do scientists need many lines of embryonic stem cells.Any benefit which could possibly come from embryonic stem cell research could, therefore, necessarily also be derived from adult stem cell research.

Certainly, death is regarded as having occurred well before every individual cell of the body has died.

Stem Cell Research: Science or Murder? | legalzoom.com

Medicine Net. com. There he was involved in research in radiation biology and.

Christian Scholar: Stem Cell Research Is Not 'Baby Killing'

Any embryonic stem cells derived would not be used for therapies directly but instead used to conduct research that could lead to therapies.A little reflection will make it evident that the Wedge argument implies the admission that the persons who use it cannot prove that the action is not just.In fact there are virtually an infinite number of different wavelengths possible.This decision comes amidst a heated debate regarding the medical and economic potential of stem cell research as against its ethical pitfalls.There just as many people against stem cells research as there are.The view that an embryo does not acquire the status of a human being until it is obviously of human form with a central nervous system and organs (as is the view of the Protestant church), or even until it is delivered (which is the view of the Jewish religion), is more defensible on philosophical grounds than is stating that human status is acquired at fertilization.Somatic cell nuclear transfer does not involve fertilization and thus turns the Pius IX doctrine ad absurdum, since it makes it possible to see in any somatic cell whose nucleus can be introduced into an oocyte, the potential for giving rise to a complete human being.What are the main arguments for and against embryonic stem cell research. cell research centers on this very question, why do. some people hold.

But the fact that making distinctions can sometimes be difficult is not an argument for making fundamentalist distinctions or making no distinction at all.Researchers must agree not to let the embryos grow past 2 weeks, and the researchers must argue convincingly that their experiments address important questions that could not be answered any other way.

Stem Cell Research: The Good, the Bad and the Obvious

Another strong set of arguments against stem cell research is that some.

Is embryonic stem cell research wrong? | Debate.org

One can imagine that, in due course, their progeny could become dominant in large parts of the world.

Stem Cells Symptoms, Treatment, Causes - Why are stem

To all religiuos people here on ATS and perticularly the christians: It has come to my attention that variuos protests for stem cell research have been occuring all.So, such a technique would only add one serious sin to another.Not all stem cell research involves embryos. Should stem cell research involving human embryos be.Human blood stem cells grown in the lab for. first induced pluripotent stem cell. used stem cells to treat Down’s syndrome in up to 14 people,...Others argue that it is immoral not to do this research, if doing so could lead to treatments for disease.This is an entirely pernicious proposition, which finds few defenders in modern democratic societies.

Should stem cell research involving human embryos be

The Case Against Embryonic Stem Cell Research:. like embryonic stem cells.The allure of human embryonic stem cell research is straight.Until an organism has a rudimentary central nervous system and some sense receptors—be it for pain, touch, smell, taste, sight or sound—it cannot form any contact with the outside world and therefore is not sentient.In addition to this philosophical argument, one should consider that there are also cogent biological reasons for opposing reproductive cloning using cell nuclear transfer.Success on that sort of scale seems a long way off—but it would be an accolade to medicine to have that set of problems to face.For the first time in his presidency,. has cast an adamant ballot against it. (This, despite the.